Email Us


Rush Limbaugh
Laura Ingraham & Mark Levin
Michael Savage & Jim Bohannon
Sean Hannity
  • Page 1 of 13
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • ...
  • »
  • »»

Midterm Post-Mortum

Nov 12, 2014 -- 12:29pm

The Democrats got their butts kicked in the Midterms.     No way to sugar-coat it.     The GOP 3will now have control of both the House and the Senate for the next 2 years.      As I’ve said on many occasions, even though I’m more likely to vote Democrat, I don’t care who’s in charge as long as things get done and the country’s in a good place.  

Now, obviously, with the Republican Congress and a Democrat in the White House, the chances of getting too much done are remote.     Congress will pass something.   The President will veto it.   Congress won’t have enough votes to override the veto, so here we sit.       There are some pieces of legislation that could have enough bi-partisan support, like the Keystone Pipeline, to get past a veto, but there won’t be many.      Many will say that the President needs to give into the whims of Congress since it was such a sweeping victory for the GOP, but remember people…this is politics we’re talking about.    Nobody gives in on anything without something in return.   The next few weeks, or even months, will be about posturing on both sides.    Lines will be drawn in the sand and neither side will give an inch.    Then, the people will start grumbling about needing a compromise.    But which side will be willing to?     The people don’t want ‘their’ side to give in…so again, we’re back to square one. We’ll have to see how this ends.    

But how did it start?     How did the Democrats lose so magnificently?     The Republicans ran a smart campaign.   In 2012, they gave the Dems plenty of ammunition to use.     Not this year.      In 2012, thre were defined issues the Dems used to stake out their positions.   Not this year.      In 2012, Obama still had some juice left and people were still happy to ride his coattails.    Not this year.     Most observers admit that the GOP won without really running on anything….except for the fact that they weren’t the party of Obama.      Every Democrat was tied to the President, and many of them denied those ties…or even voting for him!       And that was enough.     It’s kind of sad that a majority of races were decided by someone not even running for that office.       Several years ago, someone disagreed with me when I said that voting against someone was just as valid of a reason to vote, as voting for someone.      I still believe it is.    Sometimes the motivation when you vote that way is more than when you want ‘for’ a candidate.    And that’s a big reason why the Democrats lost in the Midterms…..the GOP motivation against the President was much more than the Dems motivation to back him.

So, what’s going to happen over the next 2 years?     For one thing, Obamacare will NOT be repealed.      Do you expect the President to repeal his signature legislation?   Really?      Could there be tweaks?    Possibly…but not likely.     For Republicans, 2017 would be the earliest that the ACA would be done away with…but only if a Democrat doesn’t win the White House.      If 2016’s elections were anything like this years….that’s a real possibility.

get out the crystal ball...

Oct 27, 2014 -- 1:07pm

About a year and a half ago, I was asked on The Morning Show, which of the following would be the first to be legalized in South Carolina: gambling, recreational marijuana or same-sex marriage.     Now, all 3 have staunch opposition in the state because they’re all viewed to be immoral or sinful, but I took a stab at it.

I said gambling would probably be first to be legalized since so many states already allow it…we already have a lottery (which is gambling)…we like bingo (which is gambling)….we allow raffles (which is gambling)….and who doesn’t put a few bucks on golf, football or the NCAA office pool.

Then I thought marijuana would be next.    Polls show nationwide that recreational use is accepted by more than 50% of the population….it’s natural…and most of the people who are usually against such changes grew up in the 60s and 70s and probably smoked themselves, or knew dozens of people who did.

Then I thought the last thing of the 3 choices ever to be allowed in South Carolina would be same-sex marriage.    Why?    Because, South Carolina, that’s why.     But even then, I knew that SC would allow it only under protest, kicking and screaming all the way.

Granted, when I made these predictions, I thought if any would become a reality, it would be in some distant future reality and I’d probably be long gone anyway.     Also, I neglected to take into account a little thing called the Constitution.     I was thinking purely along the lines of what the residents of the state would allow.      So, now the Circuit Court of Appeals that controls SC has ruled that the state law that makes same-sex marriage against the law is unconstitutional...essentially making such unions legal in SC.      Cue the kicking and screaming.    The Attorney General and the Governor have both said that they don’t care what the ruling is, they will continue to fight until someone else tells them the same thing…which they’ll continue to fight some more.      It kind of reminds me of an episode of Gilligan’s Island.    A Japanese submarine wandered into the lagoon and the sailor inside started kidnapping the castaways, one by one, because even though it was the late 60s, he still thought WW2 was still going on.   He never got word that it was over.  

The war against same-sex marriage is essentially over, but some people still want to fight the fight against it.     Is it for political reasons?   Pretty much.    They want to show their constituents that they fought against same-sex marriage to the bitter end and will only give up the fight when they’re forced to.     Kinda like George Wallace on the college steps fighting segregation.     The bottom line of all this is that it IS a constitutional question.     So for everyone who likes to call me about rights being trampled and that the current president doesn’t respect the Constitution, keep in mind that the document is supposed to cover all Americans…not just the ones you agree with.   

Oh, and in case you missed that episode, Gilligan rescued everyone and the Japanese sailor left the island, leaving the castaways stranded.    Sorry for the spoiler…..

Over? Nothing is over until we say it is.....

Oct 14, 2014 -- 12:01pm

South Carolina is one of the reddest of the red states.   It’s conservative Republican through and through.    The general election is coming up shortly, Tuesday, November 4th.    Most of the state-wide offices have at least 2 people running for them, Democrat and Republican.    At least I think they do…you wouldn’t be able to tell unless you’ve searched for the candidates.

Coming from someone who votes Democrat more often than not, I don’t know why Democrats even try in South Carolina.    Looking around at the political landscape it’s hard to find any real evidence that Democrats are actually running.   Their names will be on the ballots, but I haven’t seen signs, heard ads or gotten any fliers from any of them.     Is it that much of a lost cause?     Just 2 years ago, in the 7th District congressional race, the Republican Tom Rice didn’t have an easy time beating Democrat Gloria Bromell Tinubu.   This year it’s a re-match between the 2, yet I haven’t seen any mention anywhere that Ms Tinubu is even running, let alone trying to win.

Four years ago, Nikki Haley had a very narrow victory over Democrat Vincent Sheheen.    They also have a re-match this year.    Now, Sheheen IS spending money and running ads, but it’s all negative and doesn’t seem to be working.    But he’s the only person spending money to get their message out.

The US Senate, Superintendant of Education, Lt. Governor…those are all races that are in play from both major parties, yet not a peep from the Democrats.

Granted, as a red-red state, it’s almost impossible to think that any of those races will go to a Democrat, but if you’re going to throw in the towel this early, why even waste your money on the filing fee?    

Dave 0, technology won

Oct 01, 2014 -- 10:51am

If you get a chance to listen to the Hot Talk Morning Show with me and Liz, you know we do segments on technology quite a bit.    There’s always new things to keep up with from computers, to websites, to apps, to phones, to drones….plus studies on how some of these new technologies are affecting the human race.      I try to keep up with all the literature and articles about technology so I can pass along the latest.   The problem is, I am so far behind the tech curve, that I don’t know if I’ll ever get out.   


Did you ever have friends who were fans of some TV show that had a running storyline or narrative, like a soap opera or 24 or the X-Files?      Your friends would tell you how great the show was and how you’re missing out.    You thought about starting to watch the show, but when you did, you realize that you don’t know any of the characters, storylines, relationships or why this person is doing something to that person.   So what happened?   You stopped watching, because trying to get up to speed in the middle of a series, a movie or any kind of fad or movement is hard to do.     That’s how I feel with technology.      


I know the names, the words, the principal players and what the tech is supposed to do….I just don’t know how to do it.   And the more advance it gets, the further behind I get.     Let’s start with phones.    I have a flip phone (actually a slide) so it’s not a smart phone, but I’m thrilled that this latest phone has a full keyboard, as opposed to trying hunt and peck each text on a non-qwerty keypad.     It also has a camera!!!    Last one, not so much.      My wife has a smart phone and tells me all the time that I should get one.     That’s when I turn into my parents.     I come up with all the excuses of why I don’t need one…but the real reason is that I’d be lost until someone sat down…for hours….to explain how everything works.    I don’t have hours.    And I keep falling further behind.       The same story goes for I-pads and mp3 players.     You name it, I don’t have it.     I’d like to, but I always have a handy excuse for not getting something.


I remember everytime I’d go back home to visit with my parents, almost without fail, they’d ask me to go out to their huge gas-guzzling American car and help them program the buttons on their radio.   They figured I was in radio, so I should know how, plus it was one of those technologies that they never kept up with, and thus kept falling further and further behind.     That’s me now.    But one of these days I’ll overcome the fear of looking like the feeble old man and take the plunge on some of the tech I’m missing out on.    Hopefully there’s be some random middle-schooler in the neighborhood I can hire to be my IT guy.

Everything is NOT political

Sep 17, 2014 -- 11:52am

I caught a couple seconds of the Rush Limbaugh program the other day.    He was telling listeners how every story or issue is political and was encouraging his listeners to look at every issue through that spectrum.    I think that’s the root of a lot of our problems in America today.    No, not listening to Limbaugh although the case could be made…but trying to make something out of nothing.   Trying to pick a fight with ‘the other side’ just for the sake of being contrary.

The latest examples both come from the world of the NFL: Ray Rice and Adrian Peterson.        You know the back-stories.    The issues at hand are domestic violence and child abuse.     You would think that both issues would be cut-and-dried enough that most reasonable people would be aghast at what both men did and would hope that each would receive reasonable punishment either from the league, the criminal justice system or both.      But no…that’s not how it works in everything-is-political world.     Instead, I hear people say it must have been the woman’s fault for provoking Rice.    I read stories about how ‘my parents whipped me like Peterson when I was a kid and I turned out okay’.      Just because something happened in the past, doesn’t make it right.    Just because you got whipped by a spoon, ruler, belt, switch or hand, doesn’t mean that we can’t advance and find a different way to discipline our kids today.      There were lots of things around in generations past that we thought were fine, but later found out, not so much…like asbestos, lead paint, smoking and drinking during pregnancy, blood-letting.      

But people still try to play the political card.   I heard a Fox News analyst talking about Ray Rice, saying “…the anti-testicular police are coming out and taking this guy’s (testes) and ripping them off…”.     Really?    I guess since we’re against Ray Rice knocking women out, we’re diminishing his manhood?    Oh, and did I mention that analyst was a woman?       Then on Fox and Friends, 2 of the hosts discussing Rice’s elevator incident said the message is, “take the stairs”.     The other replied, “when you’re in an elevator, there’s a camera.”      Really?       That’ll stop domestic violence in its tracks.

People have argued that the liberals are using these incidents to push their message.    If the message is ‘don’t hit women’ and ‘don’t beat your children bloody” then I’ll accept that.    If this is a political argument as you say, they you must have a contrary position on hitting women and beating children.    Is that the position you want, just for the sake of argument?

In our history, beating one’s wife or girlfriend was ignored, if not expected.   Beating your child to keep them in line was the norm.     Our nation was built on people learning from the past…taking the good things and making sure they live on, while weeding out the bad, making sure they wither and die.      This is just part of the on-going weeding out process…no politics necessary, just common sense.

days of future past

Aug 19, 2014 -- 1:25pm

I saw an article the other day where Clemson University researchers are asking for the help of families in the Upstate to count how many fireflies they see on a nightly basis so they can determine whether or not their numbers are dwindling.    They are.      Reading that article made me realize that I hadn't seen a firefly (I used to call them lightning bugs) in at least a couple of decades.    I don't know if it's because of the region I live in or because they ARE dying out.      Either way, it's sad.    The thought of catching lightning bugs with my bare hands and watching them glow inside my hands cupped together or just letting them crawl on my arms until they decided to fly away brings back such fond memories of a much simpler time.     The act of trying to track a bug that's only visible for a half-second before they go stealth for a few more seconds.      Telling my mom and dad, "there's one...there's another one...." all night long.    The fact they they might be going away disturbs me...not only because it kills a cherished memory, but because too much of our youth has disappeared over the decades...and not just because I'm getting wrinkles and losing hair.    

A woman in North Augusta was arrested last week because she left her 9 year old girl at a nearby park for the day while she went to work at her fast-food job.    She faces a maximum of 10 years for child neglect.     2 we have a woman trying to make an honest living by working a minimum wage job, rather than sitting at home collecting a government check, and she faces a felony charge for her desires to advance herself.     But (more germane to this discussion) when I was 9, I was staying out until well after dark with my friends, riding across town on my bike, going to and from school by myself.       My parents would have been locked up for years for things they allowed me to do then.   But then again, if you google the words "9 year old" and "playground" the first artlce you come to is about the boy in Michigan who was stabbed by the 12-year old.     Not something I worried about growing up in Wood River, Illinois.     I read another article that asked if the reason so many parents are getting in trouble these days is simply because they're doing the things are parents did when we were kids, but didn't have to worry about DSS looking over their shoulder for child neglect charges.

Was it better living in a simpler time when were were able to fend for ourselves...or is it better than we have stronger laws looking out for kids these days?     Stronger laws are nice, but they were only made necessary because our society isn't as safe it used to be.    It's ironic...crime stats show that violent crimes have declined steadily since the late 1800s...but for some reason our neighborhoods seem much less safe than they were even a few years ago.     We're living longer than ever before, but in this world, do you want to?


  • Page 1 of 13
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • ...
  • »
  • »»